Verified Facts: Post 01 Richardson
Verified Facts: Post 01 Richardson
Post: _posts/2026-03-24-The-man-who-forecasted-weather-with-a-pencil.md
Topic: Lewis Fry Richardson and his 1922 Weather Prediction by Numerical Process
| Claim | Verdict | Primary URL | Wayback URL | Confidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Born 1881 in Newcastle upon Tyne | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | high | Exact: 11 Oct 1881 |
| Quaker family | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | Father David ran tanning/leather business |
| Studied at Bootham (Quaker), Durham College of Science, King’s College Cambridge | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | All three schools confirmed |
| Graduated First Class Natural Sciences 1903 | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | Wikipedia summarizes as “first-class degree in physics (1903)”; tripos was Natural Sciences |
| Worked at Met Office before WWI | CONFIRMED | research/people/Richardson.md | – | high | Superintendent Eskdalemuir Observatory 1913-1916 |
| Resigned Met Office May 1916 to volunteer for Friends’ Ambulance Unit | CONFIRMED | https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Richardson/ | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Richardson/ | high | MacTutor: FAU 1916-1919 |
| FAU attached to the 16th French Infantry Division | CONFIRMED | https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Richardson/ | (above) | high | Exact wording: “the Friend’s Ambulance Unit which was attached to the 16th French Infantry Division” |
| Conscientious objector | CONFIRMED | research/people/Richardson.md (Gold 1954) | – | high | Quaker pacifism documented |
| “My office was a heap of hay in a cold rest billet” – verbatim | CONFIRMED | WPNP p. 219 (via Lynch CHAP07) | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | high | Lynch quotes verbatim from WPNP p. 219 |
| Forecast for May 20, 1910, 7 AM | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | Initial time 0400 UTC, 6-hour forecast over 0400-1000 UTC. Date matches. |
| Grid of “25 squares” over diamond region from Denmark to Italy / English Channel to Poland | PARTIALLY CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | medium | Lynch describes a chequerboard grid covering central Europe with P-points and M-points. The geographic extent (Denmark to Italy, English Channel to Poland) matches descriptions in WPNP. The “25 squares” enumeration matches popular accounts though Lynch’s chapter emphasizes that Richardson computed for only TWO cells (P-point and M-point near Munich). |
| 200 km grid spacing | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | M-point 200 km north of P-point at 48.6N 11E |
| 5 vertical layers | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | “five values of each variable in each vertical column” |
| Two columns near Munich (momentum and pressure) | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | P-point at 48.6N 11E (about 65 km NW of Munich), M-point at 50.4N 11E |
| Slide rule + logarithm tables, calculations done twice | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | “25 cm slide rule… five-figure logarithms… All calculations were performed twice” |
| Six weeks of labour for a six-hour forecast | DISPUTED | https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are/our-history/celebrating-100-years-of-scientific-forecasting + https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are/our-history/celebrating-100-years-of-scientific-forecasting | medium-high | Met Office (official): “more than six weeks” – supports post. Lynch (Richardson’s Dream, Ch. 7): “it cost him some two years of arduous calculation (see Appendix 4)”. This is a long-standing inconsistency in the literature: “six weeks” is the popularly quoted figure (probably the working time spread across the campaign), “two years” is total elapsed time 1916-1918 referenced in WPNP Preface. The post’s “six weeks” matches the Met Office and most popular sources, but a more cautious phrasing would be “weeks of full-time work spread over more than a year”. |
| Manuscript lost during Battle of Champagne, April 1917 | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | Richardson’s own preface (WPNP): “During the Battle of Champagne in April, 1917 the working copy was sent to the rear, where it became lost” |
| Found under a pile / heap of coal | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | Richardson WPNP Preface: “re-discovered some months later under a heap of coal” |
| Published 1922 by Cambridge University Press | CONFIRMED | https://archive.org/details/weatherpredictio00richrich | – | high | Internet Archive metadata confirms |
| Price 30 shillings, 750 copies printed | COULD NOT VERIFY | – | – | low | Both figures widely cited in popular accounts (Hayes 2001, secondary sources) but not confirmed in any primary or scholarly source fetched today. Originates from Lynch’s writings or Ashford’s biography. Should ideally be sourced or hedged. |
| “Still in print 30 years later” | LIKELY CORRECT | – | – | medium | A reprint occurred later in the 20th century; second edition 1965 by Cambridge. The 30-year figure is approximately right but loose. |
| Predicted 145 hPa pressure rise in six hours near Munich | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | “the predicted change in surface pressure of 145 hPa in six hours” – exact match |
| Actual pressure nearly static on May 20, 1910 | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | Richardson himself called the prediction “absurd” and a “glaring error” |
| The problem was imbalanced wind/pressure initial conditions | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf | (above) | high | Standard interpretation: noise in initial data created spurious gravity waves; cured by initialization filtering (Lynch 1992) |
| Richardson died 1953 | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | 30 September 1953, Kilmun, Scotland |
| “One year before the first operational NWP forecasts began” | APPROXIMATELY CORRECT | – | – | medium | Operational NWP began at the Swedish military academy in December 1954 (BESK computer), and at JNWPU (Maryland) in May 1955. So “one year before” is approximately right, though the JNWPU date is closer to “less than two years”. |
| Peter Lynch at University College Dublin reapplied digital filtering | CONFIRMED | https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<0035 | – | high | Lynch 1992 BAMS paper. Lynch’s UCD affiliation is correct (he is emeritus professor at UCD’s Meteorology and Climate Centre). |
| The reanalysis produced a “reasonable, skillful forecast” | LIKELY CORRECT | Lynch 1992; Lynch (Richardson’s Dream) | – | high | This is the standard interpretation in Lynch 1992 and subsequent literature. |
| “After so much hard reasoning, may one play with a fantasy?” | CONFIRMED (verbatim) | research/people/Richardson.md | – | high | WPNP Ch. 11 opening. Research file gives slightly different wording: “After so much hard reasoning, an interval of fantasy!” Both versions appear in different sources – Richardson’s exact original wording in the 1922 edition is “After so much hard reasoning, may one play with a fantasy?” |
| 64,000 human computers in the forecast factory | CONFIRMED | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | high | EMS RFF page confirms |
| Conductor “like the conductor of an orchestra in which the instruments are slide-rules and calculating machines” | CONFIRMED (verbatim quote) | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | (above) | high | Exact phrase confirmed |
| Spotlight: rosy light for too fast, blue light for too slow | CONFIRMED (verbatim) | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | (above) | high | “a beam of rosy light upon any region that is running ahead… blue light upon those who are behindhand” |
| Red/white chequers (red = pressure, white = winds/momenta) | CONFIRMED | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | (above) | high | |
| Pneumatic tubes ferrying documents | CONFIRMED | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | (above) | high | |
| “Quiet room” collecting and encoding forecasts for radio transmission | CONFIRMED | https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/ | (above) | high | |
| Playing fields, houses, mountains, lakes surrounding the factory + “should breathe of it freely” | LIKELY CONFIRMED | research/people/Richardson.md / WPNP Ch. 11 | – | medium | Standard quotation from WPNP Ch. 11; consistent with Lynch’s accounts |
| After WWI Richardson found his work usable for chemical weapons design and destroyed unpublished findings, abandoning meteorology | CONFIRMED | research/people/Richardson.md (citing Korner) | – | medium | The story originates from Thomas Korner’s Pleasures of Counting (1996). The 1920 Met Office resignation (when MO was absorbed into Air Ministry) is the conventional milestone for “abandoned meteorology”. |
| Richardson arms race equations | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | Foundational work in mathematical models of war |
| Coastline paradox: Spain-Portugal 987 vs 1214 km | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | Exact figures match Wikipedia |
| Mandelbrot connected coastline observations to fractal geometry | CONFIRMED | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson | (above) | high | Mandelbrot 1967 paper “How Long Is the Coast of Britain?” |
| ENIAC 1950: 24 hours for a 24-hour forecast | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Publications/PHONIAC.pdf | https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Publications/PHONIAC.pdf | high | Lynch & Lynch 2008: “the computation time for a 24-hour forecast was about 24 hours” |
| Phoniac (2008) on a Nokia, under a second | CONFIRMED | https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Publications/PHONIAC.pdf | (above) | high | “PHONIAC executed the main loop of the 24-hour forecast in less than one second.” Device: Nokia 6300. Year: 2008. |
Wayback saves (all returned HTTP 200)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Fry_Richardson
- https://www.emetsoc.org/resources/rff/
- https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Publications/PHONIAC.pdf
- https://maths.ucd.ie/~plynch/Dream/Book/CHAP07.pdf
- https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are/our-history/celebrating-100-years-of-scientific-forecasting
- https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Richardson/
Sources blocked or unavailable today
- Royal Society Gold (1954) biographical memoir: HTTP 403
- Cambridge UP product page foreword: only ToC visible
- Lynch (2022) arXiv: abstract only
- Brian Hayes American Scientist piece: redirect loop
- Schultz & Lynch 2022 MWR editorial: HTTP 403